Posts Tagged ‘flightscope’

Trackman vs Flightscope 2

March 28th, 2010
Trackman Launch Moniter

Trackman Launch Moniter

Almost exactly a year ago, I did a blog post called Trackman vs. Flightscope where I talked about my experience with testing the two machines.  You can follow the previous link the read my initial review.  Basically, it states the Trackman is just more accurate.  This is especially true when it comes to the angle of attack.

I’d heard that Flightscope had come out with some new software and wanted to see how the two compared again.  One of my twitter followers sent me some results from a side by side comparison of the new Flightscope Prime with the new software and Trackman.

I am in the process of loading the data onto my server and will post it here when complete.  Data is located at the end of the post.

Until then, I will tell you what it shows.  For the most part, the two machines tracked the flight and launch of the ball almost exactly.

Flightscope Prime

Flightscope Prime

Some shots had variables in spin but not enough for me to say that one is worse than the other.  This test composed of a sand wedge, 6 iron and a driver.  Once again, the issue with Flightscope was the angle of attack.  Driver comparisons were pretty close but when it came to the 6 iron and sandwedge, the Flightscope was way off.  In 8 of 10 shots, Flightscope returned a positive angle of attack for a club professional.  This is just way off.

We all know that we are supposed to take a divot after the ball with an iron shot.  The only way to accomplish this is with a downward angle of attack.  Not only is the angle of attack incorrect but because it is incorrect, the club path numbers are inaccurate.   The angle of attack has a direct impact on the 3d club path.  Downward angles of attack create a more rightward path relative to the swing and upward angles of attack create a more leftward path relative to the swing.  So when Trackman says 2 degrees down and Flightscope says 2 degrees up, we have a major difference in club path.

I’ve said this before and I’ll say it again.  Flightscope would work very well as a fitting tool but if you want a fitting tool and a teaching tool you need a Trackman.  Just remember Flightscope is about $8000 and Trackman Pro is about $28000.  Accuracy is what you get for that extra $20000.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Update:  I had some questions regarding the set up of the test so here’s a picture of the set up:

Trackman vs Flightscope Set Up

Trackman vs Flightscope Set Up

Here is the Data and screen shots from the 6irons in question:

Trackman Screen Shot for 6 Iron Data

Trackman Screen Shot for 6 Iron Data

Flightscope Screen Shot for 6 Iron Data

Flightscope Screen Shot for 6 Iron Data

Here are the screen shots to show that this data is from the newest version of software and firmware that Flightscope offers:

Flightscope Firmware Version

Flightscope Firmware Version

Flightscope Software

Flightscope Software

Flightscope for Sale!-Has Been Sold

November 27th, 2009

FlightScope-KuduFor anyone interested, I know of a Flightscope Kudo for sale that was purchased in April.  It is still in immaculate condition and it has as asking price of $6500.00US.  Please contact me if you are interested and I will put you in contact it with its owner.

john@johngrahamgolf.com

Please disregard the above post. The unit as been sold.

Trackman vs Flightscope

April 27th, 2009
In recent blogs, I have mentioned the importance I put on the data that Trackman measures. I have a demo with Flightscope on Saturday, May 16th. Both machines record the same information and it comes down to accuracy and ease of use.

I was initially disappointed when I had my Trackman demo because the machine had a difficult time picking up short/mid iron data off grass. I have learned recently that this data can be gathered more consistently with a good set-up and consistent ball striking location.

More details about my Flightscope demo will come….

Ok, so here are my results from the Flightscope Kudo. I’m sorry to say for the Flightscope’s sake that Trackman is way more accurate. I used the same players in both demo’s knowing there angle of attack and other variables and Flightscope was way off. Not only was it way off but it said up angle of attack when anyone could see a down angle of attack.

Summary:

The two machines seemed similar in terms of ball tracking. Similar data with carry distance and spin rates. The weird part was the the flightscope data didn’t match the ball flight. There were instances when the angle of attack and launch angle of the ball didn’t match. This discrepancy is why Flightscope Kudo can not be a teaching tool and isn’t that great of a fitting tool.

The trackman is significantly more expensive but you get what you pay for. What you are paying for is accuracy. The newer versions will include video of the swing at the same time with graphics showing face and path to better help explain ball flight.

Trackman is the hands down better device.