Archive for the ‘Golf Lesson’ category

Online Golf Lessons – P7Golf Review

April 26th, 2011

P7.com LogoOnline Golf Lessons have become very popular and with high speed video combined with knowledgeable instructors can be a nice alternative for students. There are many places that a student can go to get such instruction. Why they would choose this method over in person instruction can vary but is usually related to cost, time and/or location. Hence, the online golf lesson business is there. P7Golf.com is a new option for online golf lessons and one that I highly recommend.

P7Golf.com was started by James Ridyard and Javier Nigard from the UK and Sweden respectively.  Both are highly accomplished coaches that have experience working with beginners and tour players alike. Follow this link to read up on their influences: P7.com Instructors – James Ridyard and Javier Nigard. Lessons can be given in English, Swedish and Spanish.

After registration, students simply video their swing, upload it and will receive a video response along with pictures and notes for practice. There is a choice of 3 different pricing options; a single lesson, a monthly fee and a yearly fee. Here are a couple of examples of pictures to give you an idea of the type of information and progress made by the student.

P7Golf.com ComparisonP7Golf.com Comparison 2

You can find information about pricing and registration by stopping by their website at P7Golf.com. I have known James and Javier for quite some time and they receive my full endorsement on their new project. They have both helped me learn so much and their willingness to share information has been greatly appreciated. I have had first hand experience working with James when I went to the UK last summer and I can tell you that it was an amazing experience.

In my opinion, you will have a hard time finding 2 more dedicated and informed professionals as James and Javier. If you know James or Javier or someone that might be interested in online golf lessons, please consider sharing this information by using the Facebook and Twitter share buttons located at the bottom of this post.

Golf Swing – How to Curve it the Right Amount

March 21st, 2011

Push DrawControlling the curve. A sign that a player has control over their swing. Curving the ball a predictable amount is one of the features that separates the best players from the rest of us.  This post is going to talk just about the math behind the relationship between the path and face to hit curving shots that return to the target. For each of these shots, we will presume a centered contact and either a push draw or pull fade.

The picture of Sergio (created by James Hirshfield) has been floating around the internet for quite some time and in fact was the start of a major learning moment for yours truly.  When I first saw the caption of this picture, I thought that this shot would be a hook and not a shot that landed on target. It lead me to research what is the right relationship needed to curve a ball but still have it land at the target. Was this the right relationship? We all know that no one swing 20 degrees right that plays for a living but is 2 to 1 ratio the correct ratio.

The answer is yes and no. It depends. It depends on the amount of spin loft.  Spin loft is a Trackman term for the difference between Dynamic loft and Angle of Attack.  Remember, path below is the path of the club at impact and centered contact is assumed.

Here are some hard numbers from Trackman:

10 degrees of Spin Loft (Dr or 3wood) path needs to be 1.5 times farther from the target line than the face

20 degrees of Spin Loft (3I-6I ish) path needs to be 2 times farther from target line than the face

30 degrees of Spin Loft (6I-9I) path needs to be 2.8 times farther from the target than the face

40 degrees of Spin Loft (9I-PW) path needs to be 3.8 times farther from the target line than the face

50 degrees of Spin Loft (SW) path needs to be 5.6 times farther from target line than the face.

This info should tell you a few things. The first being that controlling the curve with longer clubs is much more difficult. Like we needed this information to tell us that. Secondly, it is more difficult to actually curve the ball with lofted clubs. Lastly, controlling the face and path relationship is constantly changing through the set.

Does this mean you shouldn’t try to curve the ball? I don’t think so. It should just give you a better idea of what you need to produce to get the correct face and path relationship to start the ball away from the target line and curve it back to the target line. It should also give you an idea of how to prevent the ball from crossing over the target which typically causes big issues.

I hope this information helps you understand better what needs to happen to create what you want regardless of your system for pattern development. Please consider sharing with your students and other coaches by forwarding the email or by using the social media icons at the bottom of this post.

The Golf Swing Map

March 10th, 2011

The Golf Swing MapThe Golf Swing Map. This is an item I touched on briefly in my recent interview with TipitOut.com and thought I would expand on it a little bit here.

Basically, what I talked about in that interview was that I view golf information like to map to an instructor. First, here’s a little background on me and why I see it this way.  I have a very strong urge to know where I am in the world. In other words, I want to know where North is at all times. I want to know how to get from here to there. I want options as well. This is true not only in a geographic sense but also in general.  I love maps and love learning from them. When I travel, I need to determine these things as quickly as possible so I can orient myself with my surroundings.

I’m sure you are wondering what this has to do with Golf Swings. Here’s how I see it. When someone decides they want to learn about golf swing instruction they are basically dropped in the middle of this large metropolis with no real direction on where they are or where they need to go.  They may have this student in front of them and like most people will start with what they know as it relates to them. They pass this information on to the student hoping it will help them get where they want to go. Seems logical. It helped the instructor get where he/she wants to go. The problem is, they may be driving different vehicles and some vehicles may not be allowed down the same road as others.  Now, the instructor has to determine a new way to get this person where they want to go.  The student has no idea where they are any more. The route they usually took to get to where they want to go was so far back, they aren’t even sure how to get back there.

Eventually, the coach just starts going somewhere. They get lost. They ask for directions. Sometimes those directions aren’t any good and they get more lost.  At this point, the instructor wishes they had created a map to help this person out.

Here’s what I mean.  Each method or system of pattern development, as I like to call them, can be looked at as a piece of a puzzle. It is a piece to this map. Only when all the pieces are found and connected does the map take shape.  Only once the map is complete can the instructor know exactly how to get their lost student from where they are to where they want to go.

I don’t think many if any pro’s have all the pieces to the map. They may have a bunch but not all.

As coaches, I think most get real comfortable knowing how to get around a certain part of the city. The part they have a map of. They know all the detours, know where all the construction is and where all the shorts cuts are (for that part of their map).  They see the same problems. They eat at the same restuarant over and over. They’re comfortable. Then they meet someone from a different part of the city and now they have to figure out how to get to them and get them where they want to go.

Has this ever happened to you? You need to go somewhere you’ve never been before. On your way there, you run into a landmark or an intersection of a road that you’ve used many times but not in that location. You say to your self. Oh, so this road connects this to that and you never knew that before. A new area immediately starts to take shape as you begin connecting these unfamiliar roads to the ones you already know. Suddenly, you’ve discovered a new level of comfortability and new ways around accidents or detours in these new areas. To me, that was an exciting time. Making those connections provided me with a sense of control. Control over knowing where I am and the ability to get to where I want to go in any way of my choosing.

This same thing happens when golf coaches expand their knowledge of the golf swing by learning something new.  Think about it. Has this exact scenario happened to you when learning a new system that you can see how parts of it connect with what you already know? I’m sure it has. If it hasn’t then you aren’t exploring enough or you don’t fully comprehend the map of the area you thought you knew well.  I hope most coaches are in this place. They’ve started to put a map together and they understand that maybe there’s more to this city than just the one part of town they spend all their time in.

The strange thing is that some people choose not to expand their map. I’m not going to that part of town. It’s too dangerous. They lean left and wear white belts there. I’ve heard stories of what happens to people if they go there.  They talk in P’s and flying wedges over there. It’s like they speak a different language. All the houses in that part of town have lead poisoning. Why would I go there?

Sounds silly right? But it happens every day.

As a coach, I implore you to go over to the bad parts of town and expand your map. You might be surprised what you find there. Sometimes the best restaurant is in a bad part of town right? Again, it’s the same thing here. You may just find a new restaurant or park to add to your list of things to do. You never know what you are going to find and that’s the thrill.  Sometimes you may find out that an area is just a dead end and that’s fine. Now you know and you’re never locked in anyways.

Here’s the goal of all this.  Now, when someone calls you and says I’m lost and I don’t know where I am. You can confidently say, “Don’t worry, I’ve been there and can help you get to where you want to go. Here’s what you do……..”

I hope this has made sense and please leave any comments or questions if it didn’t. If you think it worthy, also consider sharing it with others that you think might find some value in it by using the Facebook share or Tweetmeme buttons.

Golf Swing – Sweet Spot Control

February 8th, 2011

Sweet Spot ControlThe other day, I had a student of mine, Dave Mon (@monb4v) asked me a question that I thought would make for a good question to the masses.  The question had to do with how do you teach someone to hit it on the sweet spot all the time.  I put the question out on twitter land to see what kind of responses I would get.  I don’t think I framed the question exactly the way that I should have because most the answers came back about how to mark the face or the ball similar to the picture. BTW, the picture shows a driver covered with sunscreen and an impact.

What I really wanted to know was, how do the teachers out there teach their students to sense the sweet spot during the swing.  Maybe, that isn’t something as teachers we should be spending our time on.  I knew before asking the question that all the TGM aficionados would bring up pressure point #3.  Pressure point #3 is defined as “The first joint of the right hand index finger where it touches the Clubshaft.” from my copy of The Golfing Machine 7th Edition.  This particular place is used to monitor the feel of the sweet spot during the swing and I think mostly during the downswing. (AI’s, please correct me if I’m wrong).

I also heard a little from the Stack and Tilt crowd about low point control. Again, another idea I had heard before but it dealt again with impact and not mid swing. Surely, we can work backwards saying that good low point control means good sweet spot control during the swing.

But that wasn’t really what I was hoping to learn.  I wanted to know how other coaches taught sweet spot control during the swing.  I received a bunch of drills about using some tees as a gate and other similar ideas. Drills I have used with success but again that is about impact.  Most of the things I heard were about teaching the student what solid impact felt or sounded like.  My favorite drill came from Shaun Ferguson. He told me of an exercise he does with his students where he uses a dry erase marker to write the numbers 1 on the toe, 2 on the sweet spot and 3 on the heel.  He would then ask his student to purposely try to hit an area of the club so the impact would erase the desired number.  I had never heard this drill before and thought it was excellent.

I’ve always been blessed with the ability to hit the ball solid very often. Not always where I want it to go but in the center.  I’ve always had a very good sensation for where the sweet spot was at all times. I told my student that all I feel is a stick with the sweet spot on it. This certainly goes to confirm the feelings suggested in The Golf Machine for the longitudinal center of gravity.  It was this point (the club COG) that I actually tried to move around and then run into the ball.  It may sound strange, but that’s how I learned.  I never had any instruction and learned it on my own by watching and feeling.  I hit many golf balls with my eyes closed focusing hard on the feeling of the sweet spot in my hands.  Is this a sensation that others work on?

I always preached and taught my students to identify the feeling of the sweet spot without having to run that spot into something to identify it.  It has served me and my students well. I wonder though if it is something I am spending too much time on or that it is unnecessary.  I’d like to hear your thoughts on this issue.

How do you teach your students to locate the sweet spot in their hands and while the club is swinging?

As a player, how do you identify it and describe it to someone else?

Please share this post with others on twitter and facebook by using the buttons provided so we can all learn from the shring of information and ideas.

JG

Disqualifications in Professional Golf

January 21st, 2011

Professional Golf DQDisqualification is the most severe penalty in golf.  Recently, there have been a couple disqualifications caused by a rules violation called in from the viewing audience.  Camillo Villegas and Padraig Harrington are the most recent in 2011.  Many people are upset about the rulings and I thought I would give you my opinion on the matter.

First let’s take a look at how this all started.Craig Stadler Towel Here’s a picture of a reenactment of Craig Stadler kneeling on a towel (building a stance) that caused him to become the first professional golfer disqualified after a tv viewer called in to say he broke a rule.  This mistake by Stadler cost him a good chunk of change as he was in contention of winning that event.  He was disqualified because he didn’t claim the penalty in the round being played thus signing an incorrect scorecard.  The problem was that he never had a chance to rectify the situation. The penalty was called in the next day while Stadler was competing in his final round.

Let’s look at the last two DQ’s in professional golf. First Camillo Villegas.

In this case, the rules violation is clear and blatant. In my opinion, Camillo appears to project where the ball would roll and cleans the area of loose impediments in the area. Again, that’s my opinion and I have no idea what he was thinking. I also don’t think he tried to give himself an advantage in a cheating sense but certainly something he should not have done and clearly a breach of the rules.  Like Stadler, the breach is called in from a tv viewer and Camillo is not notified until after the scorecard is signed so he is DQ’d the next day.

Here’s the most recent one to happen to Padraig Harrington:

In this case, Harrington felt that his ball didn’t move out of its original position so he didn’t replace the ball which he could have done with no penalty.  This one is more gray but it is a question of fact whether or not the ball moved. If he calls over the official and tells him that he doesn’t think his ball moved and the official agrees, the call in would have no effect.  The official on the ground would have made the ruling and so it would stand.  Even if the official is wrong, it doesn’t matter as many rules officials have made wrong rulings but a DQ never comes out of that.

So, where do I stand on this subject. Personally, I read the rules, as written currently, to see what is in there that applies to this situation.  I see no problem with a viewer calling in the infraction. The problem I have is they have not tried to improve the system to allow for it.

Rule 34 addresses these situations directly and I suggest reading it.

Basically, it talks about how disputes are handled and when rules can be called and puts no limitation on who can contact the committee with any violation.

I also find it interesting, as I’ve mentioned before, that there is just as much outrage when sports misses a call because they didn’t have instant replay. In fact, US football thrives on instant replay and creates a better game because of it. This is exactly the same thing as a viewer calling in accept that it happens when it should which is when the infraction occurs.

You would think there would be a rules official whose job is to watch the telecast and notify any potential rules violation to the group official before it gets too far.  This seems so simple, I don’t know how they keep missing it.

I know many of you will have opinions on this matter so please leave them below and forward to the PGA Tour so they can get a rules official watching the telecast.

Seriously!