Archive for the ‘Golf Lesson’ category

James Ridyard Mentoring

December 20th, 2011

James Ridyard is a true student of the game. I’ve known James for almost 3 years after first interacting with him on a bunch of online forum sites. I first joined these sites to help golfers and found out quickly that I could learn as much as anyone else there. James was one of the first that was willing to offer information in a way that appealed to me which was very logical and testable. He was the one that convinced me to start using twitter and has helped me learn so many things about the human body and the golf swing. Whenever I have a theoretical question that comes out of left field, I turn to James to get his thoughts on it. I’m sure few of you outside of the social media world have heard of James but I think you will. When I saw that he was offering a mentoring program, I had to tell everyone I know about it.

I often get asked what my plans are for the winter. It often revolves around book reading or continuing education. This year, I plan to spend my money on learning from James Ridyard. For me, his style matches well to how I prefer to learn. This style is often question and answer and if this is true then this must be true. He is offering a 3 month mentoring program for upwards of 8 coaches for £300.  It even includes sample testing which is another thing I prefer. You can learn more by going to his website.>>>>>> James Ridyard Mentoring Page. Registering can be done by emailing jaridyard@gmail.com

I would highly encourage anyone looking to improve their diagnostic and application of solution abilities to seriously consider this program. I’ve been privy to a portion of his video library and that alone has enough information in it to justify the cost. So many certification program cost upwards of $1500 and more. For a fraction of that cost, a coach can learn from someone I consider to be one of the brightest I have ever met and receive real diagnostic skills as well as component matching information.

Golf Facts

October 8th, 2011

Golf FactsGolf Facts. What are they? How many are there? These are questions I am constantly searching for. Golf Facts are the only things that teachers should be able to agree on. I certainly don’t claim to know what they are, how many there are but I think it will make for an interesting discussion.

Like any topic, there should be some things that are agreed upon by virtually everyone. Then there will be things that I’ve heard called as preferences. It’s usually these preferences that most teachers argue over.

This post will not be about the preferences. This will be about the facts. My goal is to list a few things that I consider as facts. Please feel free to add any or dispute my findings. Also accept the idea that if you (the reader) add a fact that it may get disputed by myself or someone else.

I don’t think the golf facts list is very long. At least the list that teachers can be using on a daily basis to help all golfers. So here goes.

Ball Flight - This is slowly starting to be accepted as a fact that the ball starts closer to the face than it does the path. For the most part, I just say it starts very near the face and curves if the face and path are different. Inside this is how draws and fades are created by the face and path relationship. Certainly, this all assumes centered contact. Which brings me to my next fact.

Gear Effect – The change in spin axis created when the ball is hit off the center of gravity of the club head. A fact that everyone should know and understand as it has a large influence on fact #1. Basically, a ball hit on the toe will shift the spin axis of the ball toward a draw and a ball struck on the heel toward a fade. That doesn’t mean all toe shots draw and all heel shots fade. It simply effects whatever spin axis was created by the face and path relationship and alters it in some amount in the respective direction.

Putts Break Downhill – The fact I have to actually write this down on “paper” is a little scary but here it is. Putts do not break toward mystical places or bodies of water. If they curve at all it is because they are rolling across a slope at a different angle than the slope is and the curve is always toward the downhill direction.

Honestly, this is pretty much what I have. As teachers and players, we all should be able to agree on these things. That they exist and we need to know and understand them.

Please add to this list. Remember. Just the Facts.

JG

Here are some updates. One tweep felt that less than 70% shouldn’t be called close when it comes to initial starting direction. Fair enough. He also mentioned that gear effect is 3d which is also correct. Relative to the CoG hits lower than that will increase spin rates and above the CoG will decrease spin rates.

PGA Tour Ball Speed Data

September 1st, 2011

PGA Tour Ball Speed DataJust thought some of you may want to take a look at some of the data from Trackman. Feel free to copy, save and pass it on if you think someone you know would like it by using the social media buttons.

Improve Your Bunker Shots – Beginners

July 24th, 2011

Green Side BunkersBunker shots can be, for some, one of the most misunderstood shots in all of golf. I haven’t written anything in a while that golfers or coaches could use to improve a certain aspect of their game. So, here’s an installment that I use to teach beginners the concept for what needs to happen in the green side bunker.

In my experience, very few beginning players have a good concept (an idea stolen recently from Meindert Jan Boekel(Thank You)) of exactly what they are trying to learn and accomplish with that shot.  They’ve heard that it is different than all the other shots but not exactly sure what that difference is. The truth is that the shot is very similar to other shots but we miss the ball on purpose. So, here’s what I do.

The most important concept that the player needs to understand is sand control. By sand control, I mean the rate, the length it flies and the amount to name a few. The player needs to learn what things effect the aforementioned items and how those items affect what happens to the ball. Because the club and ball never make contact (sand squeezed between ball and club face like grass, thanks to Cameron McCormick), the player needs to understand how what they have done to the sand will affect the shots outcome.

I typically start off with how far the sand flies. I get players in the bunker and ask them to make some sand fly as far across the green as they can make it. Pretty quickly they figure out that the less sand they hit, the farther that sand will fly. Along with that, the faster the club is going the farther the sand will go. So I ask them, which sand is moving faster? The sand that goes far or the sand that goes short? Some get it right and some get it wrong but the answer is the sand that goes farther. So, in this first exercise, they start to piece together the concept that the less sand taken, the faster that sand is moving for the same club speed. They also learn that the shorter the sand flies the slower it was moving. This demonstrates how carry distance is created in the greenside bunker.

Next I explain the bounce, which you can read about here, and how that effects the sand. I ask them to try shots both ways (with bounce exposed and without) so they can see what effects it has to the sand itself and how the club interacts with the sand. Again, the whole exercise is designed to show the player how the sand reacts to different things. In this case, it’s the club shape. How does more or less bounce change the amount of sand taken and the rate that sand is moving?

The last thing I work on with beginners is where they enter the sand. I will draw a line in the sand and ask them to enter the sand where the line is. Where the club exits the sand is not important at this time. I’ll ask them to change the amount of sand they take when hitting the line and change the length they throw the sand when hitting the line. Now, they may not be able to do these things right away, but once again, this is an exercise in concept. I will offer set up advice at this time as well but won’t go into that for this post.

Before we try a shot, I want them to understand the concept behind how the shot works. I ask them, if you want the ball to carry farther do you want the sand to go faster or slower? I ask them, if you want the ball to carry farther do you want to take more sand or less sand? I ask them, if they want the ball to carry farther do you want the ball closer to the line or farther away?  The first two, they usually get right away. The last one usually takes a little thought on their part. After they grind with it for a while they almost always come up with the right answer. Of course, there are still other things happening like spin which I don’t typically discuss in a beginners class but will talk about in a future post.

At this point, they start hitting shots. I always draw a line in the sand and let them put the ball wherever they like relative to that line.  I remind them about the concept. The concept is sand control. It’s neat to see them make changes based on the results of the sand rather than the outcome of the ball.

If you’ve struggled with green side bunker shots in the past, I hope this post helps change the goal and the concept for you. Please consider sharing this with friends or if any coaches think it may help a problem student please fell free to share it on twitter and facebook by using the buttons at the bottom of this post.

Stack and Tilt Seminar

April 29th, 2011

Stack and Tilt - Axe ManStack and Tilt. The mere mentioning of the words can typically create polarization in most groups of golf professionals and players. It’s amazing to me how extreme that can get. For me, it’s just another opportunity to learn. Today, I attended a Stack and Tilt seminar given by Mike Bennett and Andy Plummer. It was our annual Western New York PGA Education meeting.

I’ve written a bunch of times how I feel that information should be given a level ground to play on. Once on the field, the information can be investigated, studied and evaluated. However, sometimes you have to go right to the source to get the correct information before you can put it out into the field. This is where I think Stack and Tilt has suffered. The information that continues to get criticized isn’t the information that I saw today. The information that continues to get criticized should get criticized because it’s bad information but it’s not the information that I heard today. It’s also not the information that I hear coaches and players mention all the time.

As far as an instructional seminar goes, I thought it was excellent.  The information given was excellent. The stories were excellent. The demonstration was impressive. A little side note on the demonstration as it was rainy and 46 with a pretty strong crosswind from the left. Mike Bennett can flat out hit the ball. No question about that. I was able to take some nice video of Mike to add to my information and swing analysis library.

Back to the seminar. There was an extensive talk about taxonomy. Here’s a definition from dictionary.com:

tax·on·o·myTaxonomy Example

[tak-son-uh-mee]

–noun

1. the science or technique of classification.

This is the science that Stack and Tilt is based on. It is a system of measurement and classification of elements in a golf swing.  Looking at pictures and video one could attempt to classify and organize the elements of a golf swing and then look for any causality that may exist.  The more extensive and complete the investigation, the greater the likelihood to find causalities that exist or don’t exist.  I think this taxonomy aspect is either not known or often overlooked by its critics. This was the area that I learned the most about and wish to continue learning more about.

Based on their taxonomy, Mike and Andy have attempted to put together a sequence of elements that they feel would be able to help all golfers and decrease the barriers of entry to the game (too difficult).  In order to do this, they have put together certain elements that they feel will decrease the amount of time it takes a new golfer to improve enough that they will continue playing.  In its simplest form, Mike and Andy are trying to grow the game of golf.

To aid in this task, they have also put forth their own idea about which items should be considered as fundamental and why. Their taxonomy has led them to see that the typical fundamentals of Grip, Aim, Stance and Posture simply don’t occur the same way or in the same shape for all players, including elite players. By default, this means that those elements of grip, aim, stance and posture can not be fundamentals. However, their taxonomy has shown that they all control low point well, generate enough power to play the game at a high level and have a fairly predictable movement of the ball. So, using these fundamentals as the focus to breaking down the barriers of entry into golf, Stack and Tilt was created.

Why don’t I hear this information being talked about when I hear discussions on the Stack and Tilt swing? I think the answer is because most times, the person talking hasn’t researched the topic enough to know. I also think that the look and terminology have created a division amongst those that know and those that don’t. Constantly, I hear talk about how this Stack and Tilt player is no good or how this player left Stack and Tilt and went to someone else yet I never hear the reverse.  I am not saying that I want to know when players leave coaches for someone else but it does seem to create a false dichotomy of Stack and Tilt vs Orthodox Instruction. I don’t necessarily believe that they are opposites in whole but certainly contain some differences.

All in all, I have to say that the seminar was a great event for me. I learned some information that I know I can use to help golfers of all skill levels improve. I know that I have a greater understanding of some elements in the golf swing.

What more can you ask from an educational seminar?
Don’t let the three little words Stack and Tilt scare you.